|
WRDA Funding:
A crucial Step in Saving Louisiana's Coast
For nearly 70 years Louisiana’s complex system of coastal marshes,
waterways, lakes and barrier islands has been radically changed
by the influence of man and industry. While land subsidence and
sea level rise have taken their toll, the development of oil and
gas resources, the shipping industry and flood control levees have
exacted a price as well.
Countless channels and canals have been carved through protective
reefs and deep into freshwater wetlands, redirecting flows and providing
avenues for salt-bearing tides. Spoil banks and levees have isolated
marshes from their natural supplies of fresh water, sediment and
nutrients, causing vegetation to fail and exposing a weakened environment
to erosion. As a result, this remarkable ecosystem is being converted
to open water at the rate of 25 to 35 square miles a year—the equivalent
of a football field every 30 minutes—putting southern Louisiana
on track to lose 1,000 additional square miles of coastal wetlands
by the year 2050.
|
As disheartening
as those figures are, the story of Louisiana’s disappearing
coast goes beyond the loss of land. It’s about an American environment
that’s vanishing at a catastrophic rate. It’s about communities,
industry, infrastructure, wildlife habitat, fisheries and economies
at risk. And, most important, it’s about the loss of the national
treasure found in coastal Louisiana’s unique culture.
Faced with this grim reality, Congress responded in 1990 with
the passage of the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and
Restoration Act (CWPPRA). Over the next ten years, this crucial
piece of legislation provided up to $53 million per year in
federal funding to protect and restore coastal wetlands in Louisiana.
More than 100 projects of varying size were started or completed
with others identified, evaluated and recommended for implementation.
These projects are expected to protect 86,000 acres of wetlands
in nine hydrologic regions across Louisiana’s coastal zone.
|
With
the CWPPRA effort well under way, private citizens, local governments,
state and federal agency personnel and the scientific community
began the massive task of developing a comprehensive, ecosystem-based
plan to address coastal wetland loss throughout southern Louisiana.
In December 1998, this group completed Coast 2050: Towards a Sustainable
Coastal Louisiana, in which they referenced the Coalition to Restore
Coastal Louisiana (1998) in saying “. . restoration requires a single
coastal plan with a clear, overarching strategic vision; a process
for ensuring effective public input to restoration planning; and
integration of restoration projects into the overall coastal management
system.” Coast 2050 successfully achieved each of those objectives.
From lessons and data gathered from CWPPRA, from new quantitative
techniques for projecting land-loss patterns and the first coastwide
assessment of subsidence rates, the plan outlined a conceptual framework
that clearly articulates the future course of coastal restoration.
It was, however, beyond the scope of Coast 2050 to produce the technical
analysis to put projects on the ground. Consequently, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources
began to develop the Louisiana Coastal Area Feasibility Study. This
study, which will contain the engineering and technical work absent
from Coast 2050, is a key step in securing funding under the Water
Resources Development Act 2002 (WRDA)—the nation’s single largest
source of water-project dollars. Because WRDA is so crucial and
the feasibility study plays such an important role in the funding
justification, this special issue of WaterMarks will introduce and
highlight some of its essential components.
The Thrust of the Study
As an integral step in the overall restoration plan, the Louisiana
Coastal Area Feasibility Study takes into consideration the need
to:
| |
Design
restoration projects to mimic natural landforms and processes
as closely as possible;
|
|
| |
Protect
communities and infrastructures such as highways, pipelines,
wells and ports;
|
|
| |
Proceed
from the perimeter to the interior of a basin, building
the framework for landforms that will facilitate interior
restoration;
|
|
| |
Develop
a computer model to give insight into water movements,
allowing better project planning.
|
|
Over
the next 10 years, the Louisiana Coastal Area Feasibility Study
will cover the nine Coastal Area Risk hydrologic basins that represent
the Louisiana coast. The first phase of this coast-wide effort focuses
on the Barataria Basin.
The Barataria Basin was chosen as the starting point because it
is experiencing the highest rate of land loss in the Louisiana coastal
area— estimated at 11 square miles per year. From 1932 to 1990,
35 percent of its marsh was converted to open water—a land loss
approaching 360,000 acres. A “best estimate” predicts that an additional
19 percent of the remaining marsh, including 32 percent of the saline
marsh, will be lost by 2050. As the marshes vanish, the protective
barrier islands on the basin’s coast are disappearing as well—succumbing
to some of the highest shoreline erosion rates in the nation.
It is expected that without increased restoration efforts, the barrier
islands within the study area will be gone by 2050, and the headland
will continue to retreat at an average rate of 44 feet per year.
The Barataria study will develop project plans to restore the fringe
of the basin and develop a hydrologic and hydrodynamic computer
model that will enable a basinwide assessment of other ecosystem
restoration strategies. The study is divided into three closely
inter-related components:
1) Barrier Shoreline Restoration,
2) Wetlands Creation and Restoration and
3) Hydrologic and Hydrodynamic Model Development.
The
first component, Barrier Shoreline Restoration, will develop projects
that sustain the ecological attributes of the basin, including a
unique arrangement of habitats such as shallow intertidal zones,
beaches, dunes, back-marshes, bays and passes. The barrier shoreline
is the first line of defense against the Gulf of Mexico’s waves
and salinity, providing protection to the remaining marsh and aquatic
habitats behind the islands. The second component, Wetlands Creation
and Restoration, will develop projects to create and restore the
basin’s marshes on the southwestern fringe, as well as wooded stop-over
habitat for neotropical migratory birds. The third component, Hydrologic
Model Development, will build a basin-wide hydrologic and hydrodynamic
computer model of the water circulation and salinity patterns within
the entire basin. This model will be used as the operations and
planning guide for both existing and future projects, and freshwater
diversions.
Scientists and engineers will learn a great deal during the first
phase of their work in the Barataria Basin. For example, the hydrologic
and hydrodynamic computer model will be used extensively as projects
planned for the basin interior are evaluated, constructed and placed
in operation. The model and the lessons learned will then be exported
for use in other basins of the coastal zone.
Public Involvement
Consistent with the approach in developing the Coast 2050 Plan,
public comment on the feasibility study has been instrumental in
establishing concepts, goals and strategies. During the early stages
of planning, project managers held a series of public meetings.
| |
In
March and May 2000, the public was provided information
and asked for general guidance during two informal meetings
in Thibodaux. Additionally, two presentations made to
the Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary Program Management
Conference were attended by many stakeholders from business
and industry, federal and state agencies and nonprofit
organizations.
|
|
| |
In
June 2000, two formal public scoping meetings were held
during the formation of the study’s environmental impact
statement for the Barrier Shoreline Restoration and Wetland
Creation and Restoration components. Comments in these
meetings formed the basis for much of the planning that
guided development of the restoration measures.
|
|
| |
In
February and March 2001, as restoration project plans
were formulated, formal public meetings were held in Baton
Rouge, Larose and Belle Chasse.
|
|
Project managers provided information about study areas and objectives,
and solicited information on alternate locations and methods. Two
additional series of public meetings will be held. The first will
seek comment before finalizing a recommended plan. The second will
be held when the plan is completed, prior to its submission to Congress.
For more information on the Feasibility Study, see www.coast2050.gov.
|